Conqueror wrote:But if I skip to Avalon then I dont have any Fleet Carriers left. And against 2 PHR I think at least some fighters would be good or not?
Actually no, UCM Fighters provide a very ineffective countermeasure against bombers, in particular against PHR ones. If you want PD it is cheaper to use Jakartas which you already have and even they will not stop a concentrated Bomber effort. Just reduce the damage. If you want to stop the Bombers kill the Carriers asap.
But here are some numbers, each UCM fighter provides 3PD, to negate one PHR bomber on average you need 8 PD shots, for other bomber this drops to 2. So your fighter can stop 3/8 of a PHR bomber or 37,5% on average.
Your list has a Battleship and a Battlecruiser at 1000P that leaves little points for anything else, so my question is how optimised do you and your friend play? If you have fun with the Battleship keep it, though it is not the optimal choice, which is fine if you like the games with it.
The Avalon is the better choice by far compared to the Beijing if you want to simply optimise. In general the Burnthroughlaser (BTL) ship of the UCM a better then the alternatives at the moment (except to a degree against Shalatri if shields are up) only the St. Petersburg sticks out there.
However if you have not tried many games, or any, try your list first. In general you should consider what is more important to you and what makes more fun, playing more competitive or playing the ships that you want to play and/or look great. Sometimes those are compatible but if they are not keeping that in mind leads to less frustration. As you can have fun with non optimised lists. You just have to know what you want.