It is currently Sat Sep 23, 2017 2:02 am


Rules update/erratA

Stuck on a rules interpretation, get it answered here!
  • Author
  • Message
Offline

Drcox

  • Posts: 133
  • Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 7:31 am

Rules update/erratA

PostSat Jan 14, 2017 3:30 am

Can I check if these work in conjunction or supersede one another?

Just seems that in the reconquest 1 rules update (20/4/16) you gets lots of changes - like the erebos. But the new errata (1/1/17) is missing them.
Offline
User avatar

SwordOfJustice

Hawk Talon

  • Posts: 2577
  • Joined: Tue Apr 01, 2014 10:40 am

Re: Rules update/erratA

PostSat Jan 14, 2017 4:23 am

It seems that these are an additional update.
We have evolved beyond mere flesh and bone. We are the Post Human Republic.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EBC9LIUpKeo
Offline
User avatar

Bengt

  • Posts: 249
  • Joined: Tue Sep 08, 2015 1:05 pm
  • Location: Ronneby, Sweden

Re: Rules update/erratA

PostSat Jan 14, 2017 7:15 am

The download section only has the most recent pdf though.
Offline

Drcox

  • Posts: 133
  • Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 7:31 am

Re: Rules update/erratA

PostSat Jan 14, 2017 8:26 am

There are a lot of changes which have been used for some time so getting rid of them seems odd. I would assume it's in addition - but who knows!
Offline

Nobody

  • Posts: 756
  • Joined: Sat Jun 28, 2014 2:25 am

Re: Rules update/erratA

PostSat Jan 14, 2017 3:30 pm

The ruling on FACs being in CQB was reversed (previously they were considered to be too busy to call in air support).

Ferrums being picked up was also reversed (previously you could launch and then get picked up and the drones would stick around). This'll probably mean less Albatrosses on the field.

I believe you could direct deploy Apollos before, but I might be misremembering.

Going to the walls NOT preventing transfer between linked buildings is new and welcome.

I think the "no taking multiple saves" ruling is new as well, but since UCM doesn't have any I never paid attention before :p

Critical Location clarification was required and is much appreciated.

Cleaning up the command card process is also appreciated.
Offline
User avatar

Garrack

  • Posts: 429
  • Joined: Tue Jul 28, 2015 6:48 pm

Re: Rules update/erratA

PostSat Jan 14, 2017 4:31 pm

The activation of infantry which the defender does not wish to participate in CQB looks quite odd given the rule books description of activations.
Offline

Lorn

Hawk Talon

  • Posts: 2268
  • Joined: Thu Nov 01, 2012 12:48 pm

Re: Rules update/erratA

PostSat Jan 14, 2017 8:05 pm

Nobody wrote:I believe you could direct deploy Apollos before, but I might be misremembering.


What are you referring to? Or do you mean the Erebos?

German space magic for PHR would you like to know more?
http://www.hawkforum.co.uk/viewtopic.php?f=24&t=7017
Offline

Nobody

  • Posts: 756
  • Joined: Sat Jun 28, 2014 2:25 am

Re: Rules update/erratA

PostSat Jan 14, 2017 9:08 pm

Lorn wrote:
Nobody wrote:I believe you could direct deploy Apollos before, but I might be misremembering.


What are you referring to? Or do you mean the Erebos?


The ruling in the errata that Apollos and other walkers with Transition can not direct deploy. I may really be misremembering (and my book is out of reach) but I thought they could direct deploy previously.
Offline
User avatar

J.D. Welch

Hawk Talon

  • Posts: 5215
  • Joined: Thu May 22, 2014 7:16 am
  • Location: Gilbert, AZ, USA

Re: Rules update/erratA

PostSun Jan 15, 2017 7:28 am

Nobody wrote:
Lorn wrote:
Nobody wrote:I believe you could direct deploy Apollos before, but I might be misremembering.


What are you referring to? Or do you mean the Erebos?


The ruling in the errata that Apollos and other walkers with Transition can not direct deploy. I may really be misremembering (and my book is out of reach) but I thought they could direct deploy previously.

They could. There was no prohibition on them Direct Deploying.

It seems that someone somewhere along the lines wanted to game a Hellhog and Direct Deploy it (my guess, based on the wording and the sequence of FAQs), which is ridiculous and a "strike" in my book towards never playing that guy again, and the Type 3 Transition Walkers got swept up in it...

I'm not complaining, mind, as it doesn't have that much of an impact on Apollo's and Hera's...
I love my job (well, I love having a job), but a bad day of gaming beats a good day of work every time!

http://www.theroadtovalhalla.blogspot.com
Offline
User avatar

J.D. Welch

Hawk Talon

  • Posts: 5215
  • Joined: Thu May 22, 2014 7:16 am
  • Location: Gilbert, AZ, USA

Re: Rules update/erratA

PostSun Jan 15, 2017 7:30 am

Drcox wrote:There are a lot of changes which have been used for some time so getting rid of them seems odd. I would assume it's in addition - but who knows!

Yeah, that's odd. I hope that that was just an oversight... :?
I love my job (well, I love having a job), but a bad day of gaming beats a good day of work every time!

http://www.theroadtovalhalla.blogspot.com
Next

Return to Rules Queries

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest