It is currently Tue Nov 21, 2017 12:16 pm


And Now - The Monitor!

Tell the world your Dropfleet related trials and tribulations!
  • Author
  • Message
Offline
User avatar

Admiral JCJF

  • Posts: 160
  • Joined: Thu Aug 31, 2017 9:12 pm

And Now - The Monitor!

PostTue Nov 07, 2017 7:40 pm

One of the more interesting aspects of the announcement today regarding Dropfleet (apart from the fact that we can expect both Destroyers and Dreadnoughts next year around the drop of Dropzone 2.0) is that we will also be seeing the arrival of Monitors.

So, what's a Monitor?

Image

http://www.dieselpunks.org/profiles/blo ... y-monitors

In history they have been smaller ships, usually not very fast but with a small number of massive guns... usually the same calibre as whatever the Battleships of the day were armed with. They were usually intended for use in shallow waters and as fire support ships.

Now in Sci-Fi tradition they have usually been in-system defence ships, slow and not jump capable but usually heavily armed and often heavily armoured as well. But often using outdated tech (from a previous generation), so likely high sig and low scan in Dropfleet terms.

Do we know anything about Monitors in the Drop universe?

What do you expect them to be?
Why would we waste words on Prey?
Offline

Nobody

  • Posts: 777
  • Joined: Sat Jun 28, 2014 2:25 am

Re: And Now - The Monitor!

PostTue Nov 07, 2017 8:01 pm

If following the standard Sci-fi definition they'd be hard to use since no FTL means they'd be limited to acting as defenders in scenarios which gives them limited value to anybody who's not playing campaigns.

In RL history monitors commonly found themselves in a shore bombardment role, but that role has fallen to differing ship types depending on the faction.

So...not sure really.
Offline
User avatar

BlackLegion

  • Posts: 747
  • Joined: Wed May 14, 2014 10:33 pm
  • Location: Leipzig, Germany

Re: And Now - The Monitor!

PostTue Nov 07, 2017 8:36 pm

I see a ship with 4 or 5 hull, slower than cruisers but better armour with a single battleship grade weapon.
Offline
User avatar

Admiral JCJF

  • Posts: 160
  • Joined: Thu Aug 31, 2017 9:12 pm

Re: And Now - The Monitor!

PostTue Nov 07, 2017 8:55 pm

Nobody wrote:If following the standard Sci-fi definition they'd be hard to use since no FTL means they'd be limited to acting as defenders in scenarios which gives them limited value to anybody who's not playing campaigns.


Well, we don't actually have clear "attacker-defender" style missions so I don't think that's relevant.

If one side has Monitors, then clearly the other side is on the offensive, and if both do then clearly it's a system where the battle is ongoing for long enough that heavy support transports have brought up in-system assets like Monitors for additional firepower.

It's not hard to handwave away.

Nobody wrote:In RL history monitors commonly found themselves in a shore bombardment role, but that role has fallen to differing ship types depending on the faction.


Indeed, but I wouldn't be surprised to see at least some of the ships performing in that role. Perhaps some of them will also be able to enter the atmosphere and do the same kind of Close Support bombardment as the Medea.

BlackLegion wrote:I see a ship with 4 or 5 hull, slower than cruisers but better armour with a single battleship grade weapon.


Indeed... though what counts as a "battleship grade weapon" is pretty flexible. The Scourge and UCM Battleships are basically just armed with sets of their standard Cruiser weapons and I'm not sure that we'll see any of the Crippling options on something so small.
Why would we waste words on Prey?
Offline

Dheran

  • Posts: 121
  • Joined: Mon Nov 28, 2016 3:30 pm
  • Location: Ballybrack, Co. Dublin, Ireland

Re: And Now - The Monitor!

PostTue Nov 07, 2017 10:26 pm

Here is my take on UFC monitor based on Roberts class monitor used by British Royal Navy during World War Two.
UCM_Clydebank_Monitor.png
UCM Clydebank class monitor
UCM_Clydebank_Monitor.png (5.75 KiB) Viewed 321 times

Also: all Shaltari players say with me: D-I-S-T-O-R-T-I-O-N ;)
Offline

Shikatanai

  • Posts: 142
  • Joined: Tue Jul 11, 2017 7:54 pm

Re: And Now - The Monitor!

PostTue Nov 07, 2017 11:32 pm

Dheran wrote:Here is my take on UFC monitor based on Roberts class monitor used by British Royal Navy during World War Two.
UCM_Clydebank_Monitor.png

Also: all Shaltari players say with me: D-I-S-T-O-R-T-I-O-N ;)


No offense but if they implement it close to that it will be a DOA ship...
The most crucial thing is the balance between Sig an Thrust/Threatrange. There would be basicly no reason why not bringing a lightcruiser instead. I'd leave it slower but reduce the signature I guess.
Offline

Dheran

  • Posts: 121
  • Joined: Mon Nov 28, 2016 3:30 pm
  • Location: Ballybrack, Co. Dublin, Ireland

Re: And Now - The Monitor!

PostTue Nov 07, 2017 11:48 pm

Shikatanai wrote:
Dheran wrote:Here is my take on UFC monitor based on Roberts class monitor used by British Royal Navy during World War Two.
UCM_Clydebank_Monitor.png

Also: all Shaltari players say with me: D-I-S-T-O-R-T-I-O-N ;)


No offense but if they implement it close to that it will be a DOA ship...
The most crucial thing is the balance between Sig an Thrust/Threatrange. There would be basicly no reason why not bringing a lightcruiser instead. I'd leave it slower but reduce the signature I guess.


No offence taken. Could be that monitors of this type will have lower sig, e.g. 5". Could be that they will be cheaper, therefore allowing for some loses.
Offline
User avatar

Admiral JCJF

  • Posts: 160
  • Joined: Thu Aug 31, 2017 9:12 pm

Re: And Now - The Monitor!

PostWed Nov 08, 2017 12:03 am

Higher Sig lower Scan CAN work (just look at the Scourge).

And I think it's a good design space to work out of, if only for something different.

But the Battleships show that this can ALSO fail badly, so it'll need to be executed well.
Why would we waste words on Prey?
Offline

Nobody

  • Posts: 777
  • Joined: Sat Jun 28, 2014 2:25 am

Re: And Now - The Monitor!

PostWed Nov 08, 2017 1:30 am

Admiral JCJF wrote:
Nobody wrote:If following the standard Sci-fi definition they'd be hard to use since no FTL means they'd be limited to acting as defenders in scenarios which gives them limited value to anybody who's not playing campaigns.


Well, we don't actually have clear "attacker-defender" style missions so I don't think that's relevant.

If one side has Monitors, then clearly the other side is on the offensive, and if both do then clearly it's a system where the battle is ongoing for long enough that heavy support transports have brought up in-system assets like Monitors for additional firepower.

It's not hard to handwave away.


Well, yet. DZC had different mission parameters added in later rules expansions (critical locations for example), so any hypothetical book that added monitors could also add attack/defend missions.


After thinking on it, I'd guess that DFC Monitors would be some kind of light cruiser with a fixed dorsal mount gun that can do a lot of damage but also has a drawback (like no course change when firing).
Offline
User avatar

Admiral JCJF

  • Posts: 160
  • Joined: Thu Aug 31, 2017 9:12 pm

Re: And Now - The Monitor!

PostWed Nov 08, 2017 1:57 am

Nobody wrote:
Admiral JCJF wrote:Well, we don't actually have clear "attacker-defender" style missions so I don't think that's relevant.


Well, yet. DZC had different mission parameters added in later rules expansions (critical locations for example), so any hypothetical book that added monitors could also add attack/defend missions.


Fair call, but we can mostly make the same argument.

If you ARE attacking and have Monitors in your fleet then it's obviously some kind of counter-attack, or an ongoing campaign, or something like a surprise strike with strong local preparation in secret.

Nobody wrote:After thinking on it, I'd guess that DFC Monitors would be some kind of light cruiser with a fixed dorsal mount gun that can do a lot of damage but also has a drawback (like no course change when firing).


I'm thinking less Light Cruiser and more mirror-image to the Destroyers. If a Destroyer is fast, lightly armoured and high tech then the Monitor is slow, heavily armoured and low tech... but roughly equivalent in weight class. So less the WWII British Monitor and more the 19th century kind.
Why would we waste words on Prey?
Next

Return to General Discussion

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Majestic-12 [Bot] and 1 guest